Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Infect Public Health ; 15(12): 1409-1414, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2105417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant occurred in Tianjin, China, at the beginning of 2022. In the present study, we identified risk factors that may affect positive (RP) RNA re-testing in recovered patients infected with Omicron variants during recovery in hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 425 patients with Omicron variant infection admitted to our medical center from January 21, 2022 to February 24, 2022, based on the recurrence of RT-PCR positive results for SARS-CoV-2 after cure and discharge. Patients were divided into re-tested positive (RP) and non-re-detectable positive patients (NRP) groups, and clinical data from both groups were analyzed to investigate the characteristics and risk factors of RP patients. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant differences in age, vaccination rate and dose, partial signs and symptoms, most co-existing disorders, and levels of CRP and IL-6 between the RP and NRP groups (all P < 0.05), while multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that vaccination status and levels of IL-6 were independent risk factors for RP patients. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that clinicians should assess the probability of "re-positive" nucleic acid tests after discharge, taking the following indicators into account: pre-admission underlying diseases, unvaccinated status, and high levels of CRP and IL-6. Post-discharge isolation and follow-up should also be strengthened.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , RNA , Aftercare , Interleukin-6 , Retrospective Studies , Patient Discharge , China/epidemiology
2.
Front Immunol ; 12: 769442, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1686473

ABSTRACT

The prevention of the COVID-19 pandemic is highly complicated by the prevalence of asymptomatic and recurrent infection. Many previous immunological studies have focused on symptomatic and convalescent patients, while the immune responses in asymptomatic patients and re-detectable positive cases remain unclear. Here we comprehensively analyzed the peripheral T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of 54 COVID-19 patients in different courses, including asymptomatic, symptomatic, convalescent, and re-detectable positive cases. We identified a set of V-J gene combinations characterizing the upward immune responses through asymptomatic and symptomatic courses. Furthermore, some of these V-J combinations could be awakened in the re-detectable positive cases, which may help predict the risk of recurrent infection. Therefore, TCR repertoire examination has the potential to strengthen the clinical surveillance and the immunotherapy development for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/pathology , Immunoglobulin J-Chains/genetics , Immunoglobulin Variable Region/genetics , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Adaptive Immunity/genetics , Adaptive Immunity/immunology , Adult , Aged , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/immunology , Female , Gene Expression/genetics , Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/immunology , Severity of Illness Index , Young Adult
3.
Front Immunol ; 12: 716075, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1359192

ABSTRACT

The existence of asymptomatic and re-detectable positive coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients presents the disease control challenges of COVID-19. Most studies on immune responses in COVID-19 have focused on moderately or severely symptomatic patients; however, little is known about the immune response in asymptomatic and re-detectable positive (RP) patients. Here we performed a comprehensive analysis of the transcriptomic profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 48 COVID-19 patients which included 8 asymptomatic, 13 symptomatic, 15 recovered and 12 RP patients. The weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identified six co-expression modules, of which the turquoise module was positively correlated with the asymptomatic, symptomatic, and recovered COVID-19 patients. The red module positively correlated with symptomatic patients only and the blue and brown modules positively correlated with the RP patients. The analysis by single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) revealed a lower level of IFN response and complement activation in the asymptomatic patients compared with the symptomatic, indicating a weaker immune response of the PBMCs in the asymptomatic patients. In addition, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) analysis showed the enrichment of TNFα/NF-κB and influenza infection in the RP patients compared with the recovered patients, indicating a hyper-inflammatory immune response in the PBMC of RP patients. Thus our findings could extend our understanding of host immune response during the progression of COVID-19 disease and assist clinical management and the immunotherapy development for COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Diseases , COVID-19/immunology , Carrier State/immunology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Transcriptome/genetics , Adult , Carrier State/virology , Complement Activation/immunology , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Inflammation/immunology , Influenza, Human/complications , Interferons/blood , Interferons/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Transcriptome/immunology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , Young Adult
4.
Front Public Health ; 9: 663045, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1285356

ABSTRACT

As the pandemic continues, individuals with re-detectable positive (RP) SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA among recovered COVID-19 patients have raised public health concerns. It is imperative to investigate whether the cases with re-detectable positive (RP) SARS-CoV-2 might cause severe infection to the vulnerable population. In this work, we conducted a systematic review of recent literature to investigate reactivation and reinfection among the discharged COVID-19 patients that are found positive again. Our study, consisting more than a total of 113,715 patients, indicates that the RP-SARS-CoV-2 scenario occurs plausibly due to reactivation, reinfection, viral shedding, or testing errors. Nonetheless, we observe that previously infected individuals have significantly lower risk of being infected for the second time, indicating that reactivation or reinfection of SARS-CoV-2 likely have relatively less impact in the general population than the primary infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Pandemics , Reinfection , Virus Shedding
5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 127, 2021 Jan 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1054803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To investigate the CT imaging and clinical features of three atypical presentations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), namely (1) asymptomatic, (2) CT imaging-negative, and (3) re-detectable positive (RP), during all disease stages. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 79 COVID-19 patients was retrospectively recruited from five independent institutions. For each presentation type, all patients were classified into atypical vs. typical groups (i.e., asymptomatic vs.symptomatic, CT imaging-negative vs. CT imaging-positive, and RP and non-RP,respectively). The chi-square test, Student's t test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were performed to compare CT imaging and clinical features of atypical vs. typical patients for all three presentation categories. RESULTS: In our COVID-19 cohort, we found 12.7% asymptomatic patients, 13.9% CT imaging-negative patients, and 8.9% RP patients. The asymptomatic patients had fewer hospitalization days (P=0.043), lower total scores for bilateral lung involvement (P< 0.001), and fewer ground-glass opacities (GGOs) in the peripheral area (P< 0.001) than symptomatic patients. The CT imaging-negative patients were younger (P=0.002), had a higher lymphocyte count (P=0.038), had a higher lymphocyte rate (P=0.008), and had more asymptomatic infections (P=0.002) than the CT imaging-positive patients. The RP patients with moderate COVID-19 had lower total scores of for bilateral lung involvement (P=0.030) and a smaller portion of the left lung affected (P=0.024) than non-RP patients. Compared to their first hospitalization, RP patients had a shorter hospitalization period (P< 0.001) and fewer days from the onset of illness to last RNA negative conversion (P< 0.001) at readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Significant CT imaging and clinical feature differences were found between atypical and typical COVID-19 patients for all three atypical presentation categories investigated in this study, which may help provide complementary information for the effective management of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Thoracic , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adult , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Readmission , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Front Public Health ; 8: 562418, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-937488
7.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 16(2): 482-486, 2022 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-889055

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There have been reports on re-detectable positive nucleic acid tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in recovered coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. In this study, we look at the clinical characteristics, possible causes, pathogenesis, and infectivity of re-detectable positive patients and provide up-to-date information to public health policy planners and clinicians. METHODS: By consulting the latest research data and related progress data of re-detectable positive patients, this study addresses the implications that this special group brings to clinical work and disease prevention and control. RESULTS: We discuss in detail the phenomenon of re-detectable positive nucleic acid tests for recovered patients. There are many possible causes of a re-detectable positive, but there is no 1 factor that can fully explain this phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS: It can't be completely ruled out that the re-detectable positive patients are infectious. We should be alert to these re-detectable positive patients becoming chronic virus carriers, and virus serological IgM and IgG antibody tests should be added before patient discharge. It is urgent to find a more powerful evidence-based and virological basis for the integrity of viral ribonucleic acid and the variation of viral virulence with time through cell experiments in vitro and animal experiments in vivo.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Nucleic Acids , Animals , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Sustain Cities Soc ; 65: 102446, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-713578

ABSTRACT

As coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading worldwide, there have been arguments regarding the aerosol transmission of its causative agent, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Moreover, some re-detectable positive (RP) patients have been reported. However, little attention has been given to the follow-up of recovered patients, and there is no environmental evidence to determine whether these patients continue to shed the virus after they test negative. Therefore, with an objective to test the hypothesis of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2, it is necessary to 1) determine whether SARS-CoV-2 particles are present in the indoor air and 2) determine whether recovered patients are still shedding virus, thus providing much-needed environmental evidence for the management of COVID-19 patients during the recovery period. In this study, surface and air samples were collected from an intensive care unit (ICU) containing one ready-for-discharge patient. All surface samples tested negative, but the air samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. This implies that SARS-CoV-2 particles may be shed in aerosol form for days after patients test negative. This finding may be one of the reasons for the observation of RP patients; therefore, there is a need for improved clinical and disease management guidelines for recovered COVID-19 patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL